Caveat: Venter

Think about all of the things that make your brain itch. These are mine.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Library Patrols

I just happened to wonder about something a few minutes ago: What would happen if we introduced library patrols where I teach? The name needs some work, I must admit, but here's the basic concept:

Once every week or two, for perhaps thirty minutes or an hour, we faculty (in rotation) could skulk amongst the stacks, watching the students who came by, seeing what titles they perused. Most students, of course, spend time in the library researching projects or papers they would rather not have to complete for classes they would rather not have to take, at least during those first couple years (remember, I teach at a community college). Most. Not all.

Now, let me explain, by way of a story of yesterday, what this might yield. I was in the library grabbing a few additional ideas for my Monday evening class, and a student happened by. I was not conscious beforehand that I was near the litcrit section, but the student was just reading titles as if he had no specific call number in mind. As I finished up, he selected a book on Marxist criticism (co-written by Terry Eagleton, of course), so I thought to note Eagleton's significant role in modern Marxist theory. He seemed pleased that he had selected that title and explained that he had a general interest in theory. That, in turn, led me to recommend Gilbert and Gubar's Madwoman in the Attic and whatever he might find by Derrida, Lacan, and a few others, noting, in general terms, what each brought to the table. After five minutes, he was smiling and visibly pleased by his selection.

Now, how much more could we, as educators, do if only, say, 1 in 3 were to have one (possible) success story like that per term? How many more students could we energize about those topics that they have chosen to explore? How many students on the brink of deciding a major would discover a long-buried passion that much sooner?

It's easy to say that learning doesn't end at the classroom door and that teaching is an ongoing project, but what does it mean? I say we can, and should, create programs that put us into contact with the students who don't even know they are looking for these things. We can go where they seek answers to the questions that most intrigue them, and when we are fortunate enough to find those students pursuing their interests, a little engagement will go a long way toward entending the education of that one student and prolonging, even deepening, that passion we all feel for education. Office hours be damned, or at least shown for what they too often are: a passive tool for engaging the most troubled or the most excited, often leaving out the great swath through the middle.

5 Comments:

At 11:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

An interesting idea, if a bit Orwellian in origin. But how could you possibly weigh right to privacy against the potential benefits of enhancing a student's grasp and appreciation of a particular subject?

Lawsuits be damned...and lobby to begin the Teacher Spy Program today! Consider yourself to be a Secret Agent of Change! We can begin by bringing back such positive propagandized messages as "You Are Being Watched...But Trust Us...It's For Your Own Good!"

Instead...consider offering a facility member on hand, a la, someone you might find in a Barnes and Noble who can point you in the right direction and deepen a particular slant on a topic. This could be introduced as a rotating opportunity for educators who could also have a (relatively) quiet place to grade or develop lesson plans which could doubly benefit them from thinking in new or deeper directions or even just as a reminder to note a particular influence they come across in their recommendations.

There can be only two.

 
At 12:43 AM, Blogger Andrew Purvis said...

I am not certain how it is Orwellian in nature. Anyone can choose to be at a certain point in a library to observe behavior. Furthermore, we are not looking at this in a 215 sense. Indeed, I have spoken at length to one of our librarians about getting LC classification breakdowns by month so we can try targting such an effort to key points in the term.

This is, quite frankly, no different in its intrusion than asking a student what he or she is reading when we see the student with a nose in a book.

If we were to take this as Orwellian, there would have to be a darker purpose. Note that 1984 and other dystopias use surveillance to maintain a hegemonic position. Furthermore, the Thought Police enforce Big Brother's power without the option to refuse. Students may just as easily say they do not want to talk or simply walk away.

The trick here is identifying those students who are not looking for a specific book but a book about something of interest. This is easier done than it might seem.

If you want Orwellian, I will say this: I was rather expecting a Puget Sound area user to be "anonymous," so I was not surprised to discover that such was the case. Still, I am pleased that she uses Firefox rather than IE.

 
At 3:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps I was a bit overzealous in to attribute Orwellian overtones to your idea. I merely meant to suggest that some might take exception to such methods of assistance, even if the intentions were of benefit to them.

And, by the way...

You may think you have me, but it's just not true.
It is indeed, I, that still has you.
Until such time, that this mystery is solved by you.
Of just why it is, There Can Be Only Two.

 
At 9:59 AM, Blogger Andrew Purvis said...

Clearly I am not dealing with a poet. I must assume, then, that this is coming from Factoria. And here I thought it was the Aspiring Sociopath. Ah well.

 
At 6:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I knew that I wouldn't be able to put sheep on your glasses for long...

I thought it was a good signature line though.

There can only be two.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home